Archive for June, 2008

Debut Review: Lost Boys by James Miller (Little, Brown)

Title: Lost Boys
Author: James Miller
Publisher: Little, Brown
Published: 3 July 2008
Review Copy

Synopsis

At an English Boys Private School children are going missing, they are dreaming and then disappearing but no one knows where they’ve gone.

Analyse/Comments/Thoughts

I wasn’t expecting to like Lost Boys, coming of age stories aren’t really my thing. I was expecting a Lord of the Flies all boy camp bonding thing, if that’s what Lord of the Flies actually is, but that’s the impression I got from hearing about it.

There is a bond between the missing children and it’s a boy in their dreams. At the start of the novel we follow Timothy Dashwood as boys around him disappear and he dreams. We follow the effect that has on him and others around it until he too disappears.

But that isn’t really what this book is about. It’s about why he and the other boys, they’re mostly boys, have gone and what that leaves behind for their parents.

Anyone who is a parent, or is going to be a parent, should read this book. Miller explores the world we have created for our children and how a world of war, alienation and rejection separates children and adults and how that may mean they turn their backs, and weapons, on us.

This is a fantasy but one grounded in real conflicts. Arthur Dashwood, the father we follow, is powerless even to the end to save a child that doesn’t want saving. In fact his child and the other children are fighting against their parents.

Most of the conflict and exploration is internal as Arthur searches for his son and Miller cleverly takes the reader in directions and places that aren’t clear at the beginning as things are connected by links that are revealed in the telling.

The breakdown of Arthur both from internal and external events is extreme but fits the character and the story. The other characters, the wife, the au-pair, the brother and other supporting cast, feel real and rounded. Miller has drawn from a deepwell for this tale.

The only slight thing that jarred was with the sex as desire, lust, and animalistic exploration was missing from the equation for most of the novel but the stories tensions had there release in the final disturbing chapters. Though I don’t think it was about sex but more about power and loosing control of yourself and putting it someone elses hands.

Summary

Lost Boys by James Miller is a shocking and startling debut. It’s a powerful exploration on the world we are presenting and leaving our children. It’s a disburbing take on what could be. Well worth reading but don’t expect any happy endings.

Score

9/10

Links

Times Online Review
Big Dumb Object Review

Lists

Today has been a day of lists. Like the list of books for June that I’m still sorting out. If the Fantasy Book Critic is anything to go by it could be quite mammoth so have I feeling that I might have to be quite brutal and cut out one or two um-and-ah books.

SF Signal has a list of Best American Fantasy 2008 and 2008 Locus Awards. From the Locus Awards I like the interesting selection of novels:

SF NOVEL: The Yiddish Policemen’s Union by Michael Chabon (HarperCollins)
FANTASY NOVEL: Making Money by Terry Pratchett (Doubleday UK; HarperCollins)
YOUNG ADULT BOOK: Un Lun Dun by China Miéville (Ballantine Del Rey; Macmillan UK)
FIRST NOVEL: Heart-Shaped Box by Joe Hill (Morrow; Gollancz)

I loved Un Lun Dun. I’m looking forward to finally reading Heart-Shaped Box after one if it’s characters made Neil Gaiman’s Top Ten Monsters. I’m not holding out much hope for The Yiddish Policemen’s Union and I will read Pratchett, sometime.

Entertainment Weekly has 100 New Classics: Books from 1983 to 2008, so the last 25 years.I’ve selected some for comment.

1. The Road , Cormac McCarthy (2006) Must read this one or watch the film.
2. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, J.K. Rowling (2000) Not actually the best Harry Potter…
10. The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, Haruki Murakami (1997) I want to read more Murakami… I’ve almost got the short story about a Giant Frog and Tokoyo in one of his short story collections.
15. A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, Dave Eggers (2000) I can’t seem to find Dave Eggers that exciting…
16. The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood (1986) Loved this one. Everyone should read it.
19. On Beauty, Zadie Smith (2005) I bought it on a whim. In no rush.
20. Bridget Jones’s Diary, Helen Fielding (1998) I’ve forgotten how many times I’ve read this. A genuinely funny book is very rare!
21. On Writing, Stephen King (2000) one of the best books on writing ever!
30. Case Histories, Kate Atkinson (2004) interesting choice. I liked it a lot but not sure if should make the 100
40. His Dark Materials, Philip Pullman (1995-2000) I hated the first book of this series! I really don’t get the appeal!!
46. Sandman, Neil Gaiman (1988-1996) Not a novel but ok :D
70. Cloud Atlas, David Mitchell (2004) I found this one a real mess and didn’t do anything for me.
72. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, Mark Haddon (2003) A wonderful insight into the world.
96. The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown (2003) Pure escapism.

Aiden at A Dribble of Ink points me to SFX’s Top 100 Sci-Fi Authors

Things like this are always a strange beast as they rarely line up with my idea of who to include and where to place them and how can you honestly place them if you haven’t read every thing author?

Right back to making a choice of books for June and maybe actually start Julys??

Currently Reading: Lost Boys by James Miller

I must admit that at the moment this looks like it could be my literary book of the year. It might be the only literary book I’ve read so far, I could be wrong about that, but it’s going to be hard to beat.

At an English Boys Private School children are going missing, they are dreaming and then disapearing but no one knows where they’ve gone. Miller mixes in war, fantasy, violence and emotion into what is turning into a clever read. Though I’m reserving judgement until I’ve finished the second half.

Things I like so far are the narrative voice and way that Miller is telling his story. It wasn’t what I was expecting and it’s not going in the direction I thought it would. The focus has shifted from Timothy, the focus for the first section, to his father. Each is building a picture from different angles. I’m looking forward to how he’s going to mix them all together. The voice as in the tone and style is very accomplished that I’m surprised that this is a debut as it is confident as a pro.

Fingers crossed for the second half.

Reviews from other places and other interesting things: Mid June

SF Signal gives Before They Were Hanged by Joe Abercrombie 4 1/2 stars saying, ‘I’m not usually a fantasy fan, but Before They Are Hanged is one of the rare books that I didn’t want to put down and pulled out to read whenever I could’, which us usually a good sign that a book is working for you.

Coincidently Pat’s Fantasy Hotlist’s Provisional Top 5 includes Joe Abercrombies’s Last Argument of Kings.

SF Signal stopped reading The Yiddish Policmen’s Union by Michael Chabon. I don’t think you can tell if you’re going to like something if someone else thinks it drags. You really do have to read a few pages and see if you gel. There a quite a few authors that I don’t meet minds with. After you get past the style things then you can move onto if it’s actually worth reading. Seemingly SF Signal wasn’t gripped enough?

Reading Matters has reviewed Digging Up the Dead by Druin Burch and gave it 4/5 stars saying, ‘The picture of Astley that emerges from this rather in-depth but beautifully written biography is an enormously complicated man, arrogant but caring by turns, who loved to take risks but made sure to cover his tracks when it counted most’, I’ve read some of it and I’d agree that it is in depth and fascinating though may be a tag gruesome from sensitive types. (Can there be that many about with programmes like Chuck, BONES, CSI being shown daily?)

The Wertzone has a review of Shadow Gate by Kate Elliot, mentioned in my May Round-Up and it looks like Book Two keeps things moving that at the end you want to pick up the next one straight away. The Wertzone also has a review of Book One, Spirit Gate.

OF Blog of the Fallen has a wonderfully intriguing post about Debuts and hype. I do think that I’m a little strange in the proportion of debut authors that catch my eye. Funnily four out of the six books at the top of the review pile are debuts. Most have received some form of hype otherwise I wouldn’t have been sent them. What’s the phrase about being obscure? Reading is all about gaining a fan base and when you have that, though you might be a slave to them, you have a selection of people that will buy your next book.

Though if you have only a small book you might need to write something more appealing to a wider audience to gain more readers and perhaps piss-off your loyal readers… Michael Marsall Smith has had a reinvention crossing the great genre divide and is a postive example of gaining a wider audience by changing your writing and audience.

It’s also hard to get people to try new things, be it tv shows, music or books so anything you can do to get them interested is a positive thing surely? And hopefully they’ll want to read the next thing by that author.

Of Blog of the Fallen also continues their thoughts in series of posts about reviews. This one is, So what goes into making a review a “good” one? I read a lot of reviews and the more you read them the more you choose who you listen to. At least that’s how I work. Here’s my comment on the post:

Thanks Larry, and everyone, for lots of food for thought.

Mark has a good point about writers being reviewers. I don’t think that egos do on the whole get in the way. The majority of print reviews in the UK papers are written by authors as they are seen as having the calibre to understand and evaluate work. I have a 2:1 degree in Creative Writing and experience in evaluation and criticism of the works of others.

So I’d consider my self qualified if push came to shove but I’ve never claimed any real agenda with my reviews or my blog apart from championing the books I liked, mentioning the books I don’t enjoy and why and informing people of all the wonder books they have to choose from. Oh and pointing them to other peoples opinions. I don’t think you can really just take one persons word for it.
I do give as honest as I can reviews, which is hard when you are self-editing, without venturing too much into analyse which is more criticism (in the complete sense) than a review.

Yep, and you’re not going to see too many negative reviews from me either. If I can make it to the end I’ll like it enough to review it which has to make it a 6/10 at least unless the author really messes up the ending. There are too many books to read books that you’re not enjoying – being challenging doesn’t mean that I won’t read it. I don’t go for easy reads I just won’t go for books that lack at least one driving factor to read keep reading. And if they’re making my inner editor shout there is no hope.

Final mention of the OF Blog with a review of Zoran Živković, Twelve Collections and the Teashop and I’m kicking myself for missing out on the review copy of this one. And I’ve put too much on the credit card this month…seriously otherwise I’d order it. Damn!

Sci-Fi Chick has an unlucky number on her reading pile.

Pat’s Fantasy Hotlist already has a provisional Top 5/10 for 2008 with only half a year to go! Does anyone know if The Edge of Reason by Melinda Snodgrass is getting a UK release anytime soon? Oh and I’ll have to order The Secret History of Moscow by Ekaterina Sedia

Oh and some more thoughts on Hyping of books courtesy of Pat and Simon Spanton, a shaper of the UK publishing scene being an editor at Gollancz. After reading the original review I’d say that the focus was more on buzz/noise surrounding the publication than the book itself. I’ve left more thoughts in the comments on the post.

Fantasy Debut, as usual has a great selection of debuts plus it’s just over a year and week old! How fab is that!

Lawrence of The Gravel Pit has moved to Count Zero (sounds explosive). Good luck, looking forward to seeing what the move brings.

John Self at The Asylum couldn’t finish a book…offers some good insight regardless.

The Steel Remains get’s another interesting, not so positive review at Books What I’ve Read.

Fantasy Book Critic as always is packed with stuff. A review of Mind the Gap by Christopher Golden and Tim Lebbon stood out because it’s my kind of book and I’ve seen it anywhere else! How does that happen?

The we have the June Spotlight. The biggie for me has to Bloodheir by Brian Ruckley, a sequel to Winterbirth, I reviewed quite badly (that’s me and not that book, which I quite liked in the end.) Reviews have already appeared at Graeme’s Fantasy Book Review, and The Book Swede. I’m also liking the look of The Dark Ones by Anthony Izzo. I have review copies of The Gone-Away World by Nick Harway and Midnight Never Come by Marie Brennan calling, shouting in fact to be read. So I’ll have to choose after finishing The Lost Boys by James Miller, which is strange and intriguing so far. Oh and I have a copy of Superpowers by David J. Schwartz. Three debuts, I think :)

Conrad Williams gets an interview and a review. Robert like Midnight Never Come. Superpowers he feels was a good, but not great effort. I’m still looking forward to seeing how fiction handles something that only seems to work best in comic books.

Chris, the book swede has reminded me that I need to pick up The Solaris Book of New Fantasy especially for the Mark Chadbourn short story.

There’s a post I want to read later called Science in our Fiction. Good question, where does science end and fiction(fantasy) begin? I’m inclined to say make it up as long as it makes some sort of sense. I’m probably very wrong in saying that. Ok, I’m really wanting The Edge of Reason to get a UK release after reading another review.

Grasping the Wind has a positive review of The Court of Air by Stephen Hunt, which has its US publication this month. I really am going to have to take this off the shelves and actually read it to make up my mind! There is also an interview. More good stuff about Midnight Never Come (am I helping to over hype it and set myself up for disappointment?). I really have to get round to reading the guardian’s Charles Stross interview.

The Fantasy and Book Lovin’ Book Review has a review of Before They Are Hanged by Joe Abercrombie. Another series I need to read.

WJ Fantasy Reviews has fallen in love with Karen Miller whilst reading Empress. Now that’s impressive writing :D

And finally Christopher Fowler has 5 Things I Do TO Avoid Writing My Next Novel.

I’m not going to say how long this has taken to do, and read, but I need to post these things more often. Lots of fun. I hope there aren’t too many mistakes as I’m too tired to proof read. Lazy I know.

Click it: Midnight Never Come

Someone from Orbit sent me the link to the promotional site for Midnight Never Come by Marie Brennan

On top of the fab competition coming on the 9th of June the site is wonderful in my not-so-humble opinion.

Check it out!

Review: Astropolis Book One: Saturn Returns by Sean Williams (Orbit)

Title: Astropolis Book One: Saturn Returns
Author: Sean Williams
Publisher: Orbit
Published: 05 June 2008
Review Copy

If you’re a frequent or perhaps an infrequent visitor to this blog you’ll have probably noticed the lack of sci-fi. It’s not that I dislike sci-fi as such. It’s more that I don’t go out of my way to read it. I do however watch quite a bit of it and have done for quite a few years. I’ve never left school so fast as when Star Trek: Generations opened. The reason for enjoying watching rather than reading could be that showing something technological might be easier visually than descriptively or it could be that fantasy in fiction is just my thing.

How does this relate to Saturn Returns? I must admit I found it hard going at the start. Where a dead Imre Bergamasc is brought back to life by the Jinc who are hoovering space looking for proof of the existence of god. Imre then makes it his mission to solve the mystery of the Slow Wave and its devastating effect on the galaxy. A disaster he seems to play a very important part in.

But the plot wasn’t the part I was struggling with. It was the world building as Williams uses Imre’s memory loss and flash-backs and revelations to inform the reader as well as move the plot along. I guess I’m on the show not tell side of the fence and there is a little too much tell.

But then about half-way through all the plot/world-building falls away and the story gets going. And at that point I started getting into the mystery and the story that Williams was telling. I’d have preferred this state to have come a few pages earlier but at least it came.

The strange this is that as we’re with a main character who has a Swiss cheese memory we, and neither can he, be sure that what he remembers is 100% how it occurred. And Williams uses this to change the perspective on a key event when he reveals what actually happened. I enjoyed the reinterpretation and it added something to each of the characters. As the story progresses we Imre puts back together and the story is really a quest to find them and put his team back together.

In William’s galaxy humans have diversified both space and the mind. There are now Primes, Forts, Singletons amongst others. And they have more control of their bodies and how time is perceived. All this adds to an interesting and unique mix.

Overall I enjoyed the ideas and world that is presented, what makes it worth reading at the moment is the mystery element and how each of the character is more than they appear.

This is definitely an opening chapter to something deeper and more intriguing from what I can tell of the ending and I’m looking forward to seeing what happens to Imre and his little band next.

7.5/10

Extras

Reviews from other places:

Chris, The Book Swede

The SF Diplomat

Graeme’s Fantasy Book Review

Big Dumb Object